Froebelian Leadership

Project author:

Project summary:

Froebelian Leadership project undertaken in early 2023.

Introduction

A “leader is one who knows the way, goes the way, and shows the way” (Denehy, 2008, p. 107). Friedrich Froebel demonstrated clear characteristics of a leader through conveying a strong vision, a clear and coherent set of principles (Bruce, 2019; Liebschner, 1992), and a strong sense of community (Tovey, 2016; 2020).

I will begin my assignment by briefly describing my setting and why my team chose to focus on ‘community’ for this project (Tovey, 2020). Next, I will describe our project focusing on Froebelian leadership characteristics and the distributed leadership model (Harris & Spillane, 2008; Spillane, 2006). Finally, I will then discuss the feedback received at the time of writing and provide a reflective account of how my own leadership has developed.

Context

I currently work in a very small, rural primary school in Scotland. I job-share the role of head teacher (HT) and then work as a class teacher (CT) the rest of the working week. Unfortunately, we have had difficulties with staffing this academic year and at the time of writing the only pupil-facing staff were myself, a part-time HT that I job-share with, and a pupil support assistant (PSA). One could argue that the very nature of a job-share naturally facilitates distributed leadership (Harris & Spillane, 2008; Spillane, 2006) but on the other hand, opportunities are limited due to the number of staff.

This academic year, 2022-2023, we had decided within our setting that we would begin the process of working towards the UNICEF (2023) Rights Respecting Schools Award (RRSA). When the children in our setting undertook the Pupil Questionnaire (UNICEF, 2021) we found that nearly 37% of our pupils either felt they could not help or were not sure how they could help in their local community. Thus, we decided to focus on the developing the sense of ‘unity and connectedness’ (Tovey, 2020) within the school community through distributing leadership responsibilities between the children and staff.

Project:

_____________________________________________________________________________________

Current guidance from the Scottish Government (2020) states that a “Froebelian approach is applicable wherever adults work with children and families. This means that it can be used by practitioners working in rural and urban settings, in outdoor settings, and by child-minders looking after children at home and even in the early stages of our primary schools” (p. 103).

Froebel highly “valued the uniqueness of each individual but he also placed great emphasis on the community. He argued that individuality and community are not opposites. Rather, the community is enriched by the diversity and uniqueness of individuals. So, in turn individuals gain a sense of belonging and connection from the community” (Tovey, 2020, p. 6). He “rejected the tradition of teacher-led education which viewed children as passive learners. Rather he believed in education through activity and enquiry” (Tovey, 2020, p. 3) and “wanted to educate people to be free, to think, to take action for themselves” (Froebel in Lilley, 1967, p. 41). These views reflect key features of the distributed leadership model such as giving leaders “the autonomy to make key decisions in their areas of responsibility” (Solly, 2018, para. 13) and to take appropriate action (Heikka et al., 2013; Spillane, 2012).

Distributed leadership is becoming increasingly commonplace in several organisations (Torrance, 2015), with Bolden (2011) reporting “a rapid growth in interest since the year 2000” (p. 251) within educational establishments. Additionally, this change is also reflected in the documentation from Education Scotland (2015) and the Scottish Government (2019).

On reflection of the results of the Pupil Questionnaire described in the previous section, we decided to focus on raising the pupils’ awareness of how they could help both the school and wider communities. We decided to implement the following through a distributed leadership model:

  • Restart and revamp the pupil responsibility groups.
  • Get involved in community projects as a whole school.

 

Pupil Responsibility Groups:

On reflection, I regret that we never restarted our pupil responsibility groups after the restrictions on classes mixing were lifted following the COVID 19 pandemic (Sharratt, 2021). The results from the Pupil Questionnaire gave us the push we needed to make this a priority. Pupil Responsibility Groups provide pupils with “opportunities in which to develop their personal, organisation, leadership and communication skills further through rich and meaningful contexts” (Estyn, 2019, para. 8), with a clear focus on the school community (Walk, 2019).

Due to the small number of pupils (21) and pupil-facing staff (3) we decided to have three groups, each with one member of staff and seven pupils. This meant every pupil and pupil-facing member of staff were part of a Pupil Responsibility Group to facilitate a feeling of belonging and purpose within the school community (Tovey, 2020).

 

Table 1: Pupil Responsibility Groups Action Plan

Date Activity Responsible
07/03/23 Froebelian Leadership Assignment issued  

Writer (HT & CT)

10/03/23 RRSA Pupil and Staff Questionnaires
17/03/23 Whole-school circle time CANCELLED (Red Nose Day)
24/03/23 Whole-school circle time
30/03/23 Commence Pupil Responsibility Groups (Thursday afternoons) CANCELLED (following a discussion with all staff involved, it was decided it would be better to start after the Easter Holidays). Writer (HT & CT)

HT (0.8 FTE)

PSA

All pupils

Easter Holidays (03/04/23 – 14/04/23)
20/04/23 Commence Pupil Responsibility Groups (Thursday afternoons) Writer (HT & CT)

HT (0.8 FTE)

PSA

All pupils

27/04/23 Pupil Responsibility Groups
04/05/23
05/05/23 Submission due Writer (HT & CT)

 

Froebel recognised individuals’ own unique interests, the importance of a community and his leadership style empowered children and adults with the autonomy to operate freely (Cooper et al, 2022; LeBlanc, 2012; Wood & Attfield, 2005). I wanted to replicate this within our own Pupil Responsibility Groups ensuring both staff and pupils within each group felt they had autonomy to plan for and facilitate the work within their respective groups.

We began with a whole-school circle time to facilitate planning and collaboration between staff and pupils. We discussed everyone’s skills and interests and arrived at the following groups:

  • Pupil Voice Group (HT)
  • Eco Group (PSA)
  • RRSA Group (Writer)

For example, the staff member and pupils in the Eco Group had useful skills and experiences such as living and working on a farm.

 

Community Projects:

As discussed above, the results from the Pupil Questionnaire highlighted that nearly 37% of our pupils either felt they could not help or were not sure how they could help in their local community. HT found a local project focused on sustainability linked with secondary school transitions. This project focused on fishing in a local river. HT also found another community project that involved planting trees, as the local area lost hundreds of trees last year during storms. Unfortunately, pupils had not yet participated in either project at the time of writing.

 

Table 2: Community Projects Action Plan

Date Activity Responsible (initials)
13/03/23 Email to parents/careers to ask about community projects HT (0.8 FTE)

School Administrator

14/03/23 Liaise with other HTs within the cluster to find out about community projects available. HT (0.8 FTE)
16/03/23 Tree planting project and river community project arranged for Term 4 HT (0.8 FTE)
05/05/23 Submission due Writer (HT & CT)

Findings

Feedback specific to this project is limited at the time of writing due to the short timeframe which has been further shortened by the school holidays. As a general observation both staff and pupils appear to be enjoying the Pupil Responsibility Groups, however we did not feel a formal questionnaire was appropriate at the time of writing as groups had only met twice. Thus, I have provided examples of more general feedback from colleagues and families since I began my senior leadership role in August 2022.

 

Reflection:

_____________________________________________________________________________________

Through undertaking this project and the Froebelian Leadership course, I have significantly developed my own leadership skills. Prior to commencing this project, I only had a theoretical knowledge of distributed leadership from previous pieces of professional learning, but facilitating this project has allowed me to develop a working knowledge of the distributed leadership model. I recognise that I find it challenging to distribute responsibility to other members of staff and need to continue to actively work on this (Bass & Bass, 2008).

I have particularly enjoyed the collaboration with early years colleagues during the course and have decided this is something I would like to pursue. I plan to apply for a peripatetic ‘Principal Teacher – Early Years’ (Aberdeenshire Council, 2021) position when my HT secondment comes to an end.

Conclusion

Froebelian practice and distributed leadership are becoming increasing commonplace within the Scottish education system (Education Scotland, 2015; Scottish Government, 2019; 2020). I have provided an account of how I have begun to develop these within my own setting and provided a reflective account of my own learning and next steps.

 

References:

_____________________________________________________________________________________

Aberdeenshire Council. (2021). Job Profile Principal Teacher (Early Years). My Job Scotland. https://admin.myjobscotland.gov.uk/sites/default/files/job-attachments/2022/11/306498/Job%20Profile%20Principal%20Teacher%20%28Early%20Years%29.pdf?_gl=1*1ebh6w5*_ga*OTIxMTk0OTU2LjE2NzUyODYwMjc.*_ga_JDRQF5ZSBE*MTY3ODYzMzYyNS4zNS4xLjE2Nzg2MzM2OTIuMC4wLjA.

Bass, B.M., & Bass, R. (2008). The Bass Handbook of Leadership Theory, Research, and Managerial Applications (4th ed.). Free Press.

Bolden, R. (2011). Distributed leadership in organizations: A review of theory and research. International journal of management reviews13(3), 251-269.

Bruce, T. (2019). Educating Young Children: A Lifetime Journey into a Froebelian Approach: The Selected Works of Tina Bruce. Routledge.

Cooper, M., Siu, C. T. S., McMullen, M. B., Rockel, J., & Powell, S. (2022). A multi-layered dialogue: Exploring Froebel’s influence on pedagogies of care with 1-year-olds across four cultures. Global Education Review, 9(1), 6-23.

Denehy J. (2008). Leadership characteristics. Journal of School Nursing, 24(3), 107–110.

Education Scotland. (2015). How good is our school? 4th Edition. https://education.gov.scot/improvement/Documents/Frameworks_SelfEvaluation/FRWK2_NIHeditHGIOS/FRWK2_HGIOS4.pdf

Estyn. (2019). Embedding pupil voice into the school ethos. https://www.estyn.gov.wales/effective-practice/embedding-pupil-voice-school-ethos

Harris, A. & Spillane, J. (2008). Distributed leadership through the looking glass.https://distributedleadership.northwestern.edu

Heikka, J., Waniganayake, M., & Hujala, E. (2013). Contextualizing distributed leadership within early childhood education: Current understandings, research evidence and future challenges. Educational Management Administration & Leadership41(1), 30-44.

LeBlanc, M. (2012). Friedrich Froebel, his life and influence on education. Community Playthings. https://www.communityplaythings.co.uk/learning-library/articles/friedrich-froebel

Liebschner, J. (1992). A Child’s Work. Freedom and Guidance in Froebel’s Educational Theory and Practice. Cambridge: The Lutterworth Press.

Lilley, I. M. (1967). Friedrich Froebel: A selection from his writings. Cambridge University Press.

Scottish Government. (2019). 2019 National Improvement Framework and Improvement Plan: summary document. https://www.gov.scot/binaries/content/documents/govscot/publications/strategy-plan/2018/12/2019-national-improvement-framework-improvement-plan/documents/2019-national-improvement-framework-improvement-plan/2019-national-improvement-framework-improvement-plan/govscot%3Adocument/00543908.pdf

Scottish Government. (2020). Realising the Ambition: Being Me. https://education.gov.scot/media/3bjpr3wa/realisingtheambition.pdf

Sharratt, N. (2021). Covid-19 pandemic: impact on children and young people. Scottish Parliament. https://www.parliament.scot/~/media/committ/1494

Solly, B. (2018). Distributed leadership explained. SecEd. https://www.sec-ed.co.uk/best-practice/distributed-leadership-explained/

Spillane, J. P. (2012). Distributed leadership. John Wiley & Sons.

Torrance, D. (2015). Professional learning for distributed leadership: primary headteachers’ perspectives. Professional Development in Education41(3), 487-507.

Tovey, H. (2016). Bringing the Froebel approach to your early years practice. Taylor & Francis.

Tovey, H. (2020). Froebel’s Principles and Practice Today. Froebel Trust. https://www.froebel.org.uk/uploads/documents/FT-Froebels-principles-and-practice-today.pdf

UNICEF. (2021). Pupil Questionnaire. https://www.unicef.org.uk/rights-respecting-schools/wp-content/uploads/sites/4/2018/10/RRSA-pupil-questionnaire_secondary.pdf

UNICEF. (2023). Rights Respecting Schools. https://www.unicef.org.uk/rights-respecting-schools/

Walk, M. (2019). Riverside Primary School and Nursery Class, Progress Report for Session 2018/2019. West Lothian Council. https://www.westlothian.gov.uk/media/4649/Riverside-Primary-School-Standards-and-Quality-Report/pdf/2019_Standards_and_Quality_Report.pdf?m=637057954276700000

Wood, E. & Attfield, J. (2005). Ideologies, ideals and theories. SAGE Publications Ltd.

Research implications

N/A

Practitioner enquiry

N/A

Leadership learning

N/A

Author and role

N/A

Comments from other network members

What did you appreciate about this research? What forward-looking questions did it raise for you?

Add a comment